|
Recent Decay in Performance of Many Quantitatively Managed Funds
Attributed to Rising Correlations, Style Rotation, “Herding”
Phenomena and the Activity of Hedge Funds, New Study Finds
Participants in the new Fabozzi-Intertek study commissioned by the
Research Foundation of the CFA Institute attributed recent decay in
performance at many quantitatively managed equity funds to rising correlation
levels, style rotation and the fact that there are now more active
quantitative managers using the same data and similar models. Specific to the
problems many quantitative funds experienced in the summer of 2007,
participants in the study attributed losses to the activity of hedge funds
unwinding positions.
While
alpha generation was identified by participants as the most important selling
point for a quantitative fund, nearly three fourths of the study’s
participants believe that it will become increasingly difficult for
quantitative equity managers to find profit opportunities. The reason is that
most models rely on similar predictive factors extracted from commercial data
sets and academic models and therefore reach similar conclusions as regards
investment opportunities.
For
quantitative equity managers, the challenge is to add more and unique
information. A recent development which even large quantitatively-managed
firms are eyeing with attention is the hybridization of a fundamental
approach with a quantitative approach. The belief is that outperformance can
be obtained by commingling in-depth knowledge of a sector or a listed firm
with a more disciplined statistical approach.
However,
most quantitative managers and investment consultants that participated in
the study are more comfortable with a pure quantitative approach that does
not introduce judgement expect in rare cases such as before a big trade. In
an effort to avoid being caught holding the same portfolio as every other
quant (as apparently happened in the summer of 2007), participants said they
will put the accent on identifying new and unique factors, employ new models,
and diversity sources of information and data.
The
study is based on conversations with asset managers, investment consultants,
fund-rating agencies, and consultants to the industry as well as survey
responses from asset managers. In total, 12 asset managers and 8 consultants
and fund-rating agencies were interviewed. The survey results reflect the
opinions and experience of 31 managers with a total of $2,194 trillion in equities
under management.
The
study is published as a monograph by the CFA Institute. To order or download
a copy of Challenges in Equity Portfolio Management, see
www.cfapubs.org/toc/rf/2008/2008/2
|